CanonLaw.Ninja - Search Results

Canon	Text
General Norms » Singular Administrative Acts » Rescripts
Canon 63. Previous Next	§1 Except where there is question of a rescript which grants a favour Motu proprio, subreption, that is, the withholding of the truth, renders a rescript invalid if the request does not express that which, according to canonical law, style and practice, must for validity be expressed. §2 Obreption, that is, the making of a false statement, renders a rescript invalid if not even one of the motivating reasons submitted is true. §3 In rescripts of which there is no executor, the motivating reason must be true at the time the rescript is issued; in the others, at the time of execution.

Canon

Text

General Norms » Singular Administrative Acts » Rescripts

§1 Except where there is question of a rescript which grants a favour Motu proprio, subreption, that is, the withholding of the truth, renders a rescript invalid if the request does not express that which, according to canonical law, style and practice, must for validity be expressed.

§2 Obreption, that is, the making of a false statement, renders a rescript invalid if not even one of the motivating reasons submitted is true.

§3 In rescripts of which there is no executor, the motivating reason must be true at the time the rescript is issued; in the others, at the time of execution.

Page generated in 0.0029 seconds.